Abstracts – Browse Results

Search or browse again.

Click on the titles below to expand the information about each abstract.
Viewing 7 results ...

Habibi, M and Kermanshachi, S (2018) Phase-based analysis of key cost and schedule performance causes and preventive strategies. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(08), 1009–33.

Jacob, J and Varghese, K (2018) A framework for ad hoc information management for the building design process. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(08), 1034–52.

Jacobsson, M and Merschbrock, C (2018) BIM coordinators: a review. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(08), 989–1008.

  • Type: Journal Article
  • Keywords: Information systems; Project management; Building information modelling; Integrated practice;
  • ISBN/ISSN: 0969-9988
  • URL: https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-03-2017-0050
  • Abstract:
    The purpose of this paper is to explore the role, practices and responsibilities of building information modeling (BIM) coordinators (BCs). Design/methodology/approach The aim is achieved through a review of existing publications (n=183) in which the term “BIM coordinators” has been described and discussed (n=78), complemented by interviews with four Norwegian BIM experts. Findings The findings from the review indicate that the core responsibilities of BCs involve clash detection, managing information flows and communication flows, monitoring and coordinating design changes, supporting new working procedures and technical development and acting as a boundary spanner. The complementary interview study extends these findings with two additional practices and a reflection on the experienced challenges, obstacles and potential future development of the role. In essence, the authors propose that the role of BCs can be defined as being responsible for external/internal alignment and coordination of actor needs, and engaged in product-, process- and system-oriented practices of BIM. Research limitations/implications Given that this study is primarily an integrative literature review of BCs, it has the limitations common with such an approach. Therefore, future studies should preferably extend presented findings through either a survey, further in-depth interviews with BCs or reviews of closely related BIM specialist roles such as BIM managers or BIM technicians. Practical implications With BCs seemingly being central to information management and knowledge domain integration within the architecture, engineering and construction industry, an understanding of their importance and role should be of interest to anyone seeking to tap into the potential of BIM. This paper outlines specific implications for construction manager, educators and BCs. Originality/value The value of this study lies primarily in the fact that it is the first thorough investigation of the role, practices and responsibilities of BCs.

Meng, J, Yan, J, Xue, B, Fu, J and He, N (2018) Reducing construction material cost by optimizing buy-in decision that accounts the flexibility of non-critical activities. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(08), 1092–108.

Rohani, M, Shafabakhsh, G, Haddad, A and Asnaashari, E (2018) Strategy management of construction workspaces by conflict resolution algorithm and visualization model. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(08), 1053–74.

Sawan, R, Low, J F and Schiffauerova, A (2018) Quality cost of material procurement in construction projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(08), 974–88.

Sepasgozar, S M, Davis, S, Loosemore, M and Bernold, L (2018) An investigation of modern building equipment technology adoption in the Australian construction industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 25(08), 1075–91.